Los Angeles Rams Gear On Sale - Save Up To 70%

Los Angeles Rams Gear On Sale - Save Up To 70%

×

Live Game Broadcast

Geo-Restrictions May Apply.

Audacy app or Listen Live.

🎧

Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Open Discussion On The Los Angeles Rams

Moderator: GlendoraRam

Post Reply
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 8978
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Cornell29 »

Seattle is a team that doesn't come out of their nickel to defend due to the size of their front and Nick Emmanwori (nickel / Joker)

Please Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
brasilrams
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5883
Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
Has thanked: 687 times
Been thanked: 258 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by brasilrams »

Cornell29 wrote: December 16th, 2025, 6:20 pm Seattle is a team that doesn't come out of their nickel to defend due to the size of their front and Nick Emmanwori (nickel / Joker)

Well , Sean knows his offense couldn't do shit against seattle in the last game so I am guessing he will change things quite a bit. I am thinking we will barely use 13 personnel this time...
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 8978
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Cornell29 »

I'm hoping McClendon playing over Hav (who was horrible vs Seattle last time) helps as well.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
NorCal RF
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7715
Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 517 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by NorCal RF »

One game…….

And that one game we still put a w in the win column……..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
DelMar
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7435
Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by DelMar »

I am guessing Sean and Shula know this... I think we may see something NONE of us expected tomorrow ngt. Cant wait
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
therealheadslap75
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2084
Joined: February 1st, 2015, 8:35 am
Has thanked: 58 times
Been thanked: 96 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by therealheadslap75 »

while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 8978
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Cornell29 »

therealheadslap75 wrote: December 17th, 2025, 9:45 pm while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
Good points.

McClendon is a upgrade to Hav
Ferg has been a blocking machine (best blocking TE in NFL) and is now playing as many as 70 percent of the snaps. Higs is solid but Ferg is even outblockinh him.
While Adams might miss the game, he didn't do much of anything the 1st time the rams played Seattle.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Rampager66
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5187
Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 3:46 pm
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 420 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Rampager66 »

Cornell29 wrote: December 18th, 2025, 4:14 am
therealheadslap75 wrote: December 17th, 2025, 9:45 pm while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
Good points.

McClendon is a upgrade to Hav
Ferg has been a blocking machine (best blocking TE in NFL) and is now playing as many as 70 percent of the snaps. Higs is solid but Ferg is even outblockinh him.
While Adams might miss the game, he didn't do much of anything the 1st time the rams played Seattle.
Adams was targeted 8 times but only had 1 - 10 yard reception for 1 of the 3 Ram TD's on the day vs the Hags!
They only targeted Parks twice that game so I think we'll see him more involved w/o Adams.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
malibu
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 24th, 2017, 5:19 pm
Been thanked: 146 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by malibu »

DelMar wrote: December 17th, 2025, 5:07 pm I am guessing Sean and Shula know this... I think we may see something NONE of us expected tomorrow ngt. Cant wait
I was the thinking the same thing! McVay is coming out with a different game plan. After the rain game in Carolina and how they played us last time I think McVay and Lafleur are going to have something different.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
49RH8R
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2100
Joined: January 26th, 2016, 10:54 am
Has thanked: 319 times
Been thanked: 209 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by 49RH8R »

Cornell29 wrote: December 16th, 2025, 6:20 pm Seattle is a team that doesn't come out of their nickel to defend due to the size of their front and Nick Emmanwori (nickel / Joker)

I just read an article that Seattle's defense forced us out of 13 personnel and back to 11 personnel. McVay (and the Hawks) know what to expect now. Should be a great game.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Cornell29
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 8978
Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
Has thanked: 97 times
Been thanked: 602 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Cornell29 »

49RH8R wrote: December 18th, 2025, 8:50 am
Cornell29 wrote: December 16th, 2025, 6:20 pm Seattle is a team that doesn't come out of their nickel to defend due to the size of their front and Nick Emmanwori (nickel / Joker)

I just read an article that Seattle's defense forced us out of 13 personnel and back to 11 personnel. McVay (and the Hawks) know what to expect now. Should be a great game.
They never came out of their big nickel. Even when the Rams effectively ran successfully against it on earlier drives. Instead of coming out of big nickel they just stacked the line (while remaining in big nickel) and dared Mcvay to throw. So the passing advantages wasn't there with 3 tight ends so Mcvay went with 3 wrs to attack their big nickel.

Rams have to run the ball effectively against their big nickel base defense, even when they stack the line and force them to go with a traditional 4-3. This allows the rams tight ends more favorable matchups in the passing game.

What makes Seattle different then most teams the rams play is Seattle have Nick Emmanwori who is a hybrid and they use him to play big nickel. He is big enough to be a LB but can cover as well as a safety. Good against run and pass. Because of Nick, Seattle stats in their big nickel, bc he is like having a 3rd lb, despite being a safety. Seattle having a big run stopping front, along with good lbs and cbs that can cover, are issues for the rams as well.

I know one thing, the rams cannot afford any turnovers or mistakes on offense.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
DelMar
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7435
Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by DelMar »

Cornell29 wrote: December 18th, 2025, 10:02 am
49RH8R wrote: December 18th, 2025, 8:50 am

I just read an article that Seattle's defense forced us out of 13 personnel and back to 11 personnel. McVay (and the Hawks) know what to expect now. Should be a great game.

I know one thing, the rams cannot afford any turnovers or mistakes on offense.

^ I really believe this is the key to the game. Need to not turn the ball over.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Jack85Youngblood
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 579
Joined: January 13th, 2016, 12:27 pm
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Jack85Youngblood »

Hoping Rams defeat the "big nickel" with a bomb to Atwell early
Image
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
DelMar
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7435
Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by DelMar »

You guys think we might see the 14 personnel tonight?

Incase you're wondering... this is when McVay is so heated he cant stay off the field.

Remember this guy? He maybe needed again.
Attachments
Screenshot 2025-12-18 at 3.35.43 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-12-18 at 3.35.43 PM.png (337.25 KiB) Viewed 130 times
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Rampager66
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5187
Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 3:46 pm
Has thanked: 736 times
Been thanked: 420 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Rampager66 »

DelMar wrote: December 18th, 2025, 3:31 pm You guys think we might see the 14 personnel tonight?

Incase you're wondering... this is when McVay is so heated he cant stay off the field.

Remember this guy? He maybe needed again.
Imagine having hog tying the coach if he goes too far onto the field of play as part of your job description. :)
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
DelMar
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 7435
Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
Has thanked: 1296 times
Been thanked: 771 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by DelMar »

Rampager66 wrote: December 18th, 2025, 3:38 pm
DelMar wrote: December 18th, 2025, 3:31 pm You guys think we might see the 14 personnel tonight?

Incase you're wondering... this is when McVay is so heated he cant stay off the field.

Remember this guy? He maybe needed again.
Imagine having hog tying the coach if he goes too far onto the field of play as part of your job description. :)

Right?!

You have to just wonder what his linkedin or CV/Resume says... like

Years: 2018-2021
Employer: Los Angeles Rams
Position: Assistant Coach
Duties: Yanking on McVay all game long

This is still the weirdest thing in my mind in the Sean McVay era....

:D

Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
User avatar
Ants
Hall of Fame Member
Hall of Fame Member
Posts: 1088
Joined: January 27th, 2016, 5:57 am
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams

Post by Ants »

Jack85Youngblood wrote: December 18th, 2025, 11:35 am Hoping Rams defeat the "big nickel" with a bomb to Atwell early
...and often
The Los Angeles Rams - Making the NFL Great Again. 8-)
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ants, bigklein, Claremontram, Commish, FelixTheStonerCat, JackRam, NorCal RF, SoCalRam78 and 40 guests