🎧
Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Moderator: GlendoraRam
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Seattle is a team that doesn't come out of their nickel to defend due to the size of their front and Nick Emmanwori (nickel / Joker)
Please Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5882
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 685 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Well , Sean knows his offense couldn't do shit against seattle in the last game so I am guessing he will change things quite a bit. I am thinking we will barely use 13 personnel this time...
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
I'm hoping McClendon playing over Hav (who was horrible vs Seattle last time) helps as well.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7711
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
One game…….
And that one game we still put a w in the win column……..
And that one game we still put a w in the win column……..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7435
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1296 times
- Been thanked: 771 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
I am guessing Sean and Shula know this... I think we may see something NONE of us expected tomorrow ngt. Cant wait
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- therealheadslap75
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2084
- Joined: February 1st, 2015, 8:35 am
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Good points.therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑December 17th, 2025, 9:45 pm while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
McClendon is a upgrade to Hav
Ferg has been a blocking machine (best blocking TE in NFL) and is now playing as many as 70 percent of the snaps. Higs is solid but Ferg is even outblockinh him.
While Adams might miss the game, he didn't do much of anything the 1st time the rams played Seattle.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Rampager66
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5187
- Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 3:46 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 420 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Adams was targeted 8 times but only had 1 - 10 yard reception for 1 of the 3 Ram TD's on the day vs the Hags!Cornell29 wrote: ↑December 18th, 2025, 4:14 amGood points.therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑December 17th, 2025, 9:45 pm while it's in approximation, the Rams ran 13 personnel 18/50 plays about 36% of the time, they've been running it over 60% the last three weeks, the Seahawks sample size is not that great and I think Havenstein was an absolute liability, I don't know if the Seahawks should be high-fiving because the ram still ran the ball pretty easily
McClendon is a upgrade to Hav
Ferg has been a blocking machine (best blocking TE in NFL) and is now playing as many as 70 percent of the snaps. Higs is solid but Ferg is even outblockinh him.
While Adams might miss the game, he didn't do much of anything the 1st time the rams played Seattle.
They only targeted Parks twice that game so I think we'll see him more involved w/o Adams.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
I was the thinking the same thing! McVay is coming out with a different game plan. After the rain game in Carolina and how they played us last time I think McVay and Lafleur are going to have something different.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- 49RH8R
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2100
- Joined: January 26th, 2016, 10:54 am
- Has thanked: 319 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
I just read an article that Seattle's defense forced us out of 13 personnel and back to 11 personnel. McVay (and the Hawks) know what to expect now. Should be a great game.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
They never came out of their big nickel. Even when the Rams effectively ran successfully against it on earlier drives. Instead of coming out of big nickel they just stacked the line (while remaining in big nickel) and dared Mcvay to throw. So the passing advantages wasn't there with 3 tight ends so Mcvay went with 3 wrs to attack their big nickel.
Rams have to run the ball effectively against their big nickel base defense, even when they stack the line and force them to go with a traditional 4-3. This allows the rams tight ends more favorable matchups in the passing game.
What makes Seattle different then most teams the rams play is Seattle have Nick Emmanwori who is a hybrid and they use him to play big nickel. He is big enough to be a LB but can cover as well as a safety. Good against run and pass. Because of Nick, Seattle stats in their big nickel, bc he is like having a 3rd lb, despite being a safety. Seattle having a big run stopping front, along with good lbs and cbs that can cover, are issues for the rams as well.
I know one thing, the rams cannot afford any turnovers or mistakes on offense.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7435
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1296 times
- Been thanked: 771 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
^ I really believe this is the key to the game. Need to not turn the ball over.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Jack85Youngblood
- VIP Member

- Posts: 579
- Joined: January 13th, 2016, 12:27 pm
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Hoping Rams defeat the "big nickel" with a bomb to Atwell early

Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7435
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1296 times
- Been thanked: 771 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
You guys think we might see the 14 personnel tonight?
Incase you're wondering... this is when McVay is so heated he cant stay off the field.
Remember this guy? He maybe needed again.
Incase you're wondering... this is when McVay is so heated he cant stay off the field.
Remember this guy? He maybe needed again.
- Attachments
-
- Screenshot 2025-12-18 at 3.35.43 PM.png (337.25 KiB) Viewed 127 times
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Rampager66
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5187
- Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 3:46 pm
- Has thanked: 736 times
- Been thanked: 420 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Imagine having hog tying the coach if he goes too far onto the field of play as part of your job description.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- DelMar
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7435
- Joined: January 31st, 2023, 11:01 am
- Has thanked: 1296 times
- Been thanked: 771 times
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
Rampager66 wrote: ↑December 18th, 2025, 3:38 pmImagine having hog tying the coach if he goes too far onto the field of play as part of your job description.![]()
Right?!
You have to just wonder what his linkedin or CV/Resume says... like
Years: 2018-2021
Employer: Los Angeles Rams
Position: Assistant Coach
Duties: Yanking on McVay all game long
This is still the weirdest thing in my mind in the Sean McVay era....
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Seattle vs Rams 13 Personnel.. Not good for Rams
...and oftenJack85Youngblood wrote: ↑December 18th, 2025, 11:35 am Hoping Rams defeat the "big nickel" with a bomb to Atwell early
The Los Angeles Rams - Making the NFL Great Again. 8-)
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: brasilrams, Claremontram, Jacksnow, LARAMFAN52, Midnighter67, RAMFAN71, SoCalRam78 and 33 guests
