🎧
It’s Raheem
Moderator: GlendoraRam
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2805
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Bottom post of the previous page:
This change either has not gelled yet, or it is just a step in the wrong direction. Morris IMO should have not tinkered with last season's #1. The loss of JJ and Hill may have forced it, but maybe not. DW and Fuller are playing much worse....and Rapp too. And again, our ILB cannot cover. So.....add it all up and theres gonna be problems."60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7717
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: It’s Raheem
He hasn’t been good which is surprising. Not sure this moving corners around in coverage benefits him as a young CBBrooklynRam74 wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 8:37 amWhat's most noticeable to my "layman" eyes is the drop off in play from Darious Williams. Got his pay on RFA Contract, but I doubt we take the next step with him.NorCal RF wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 8:28 am Aikman nailed it last night when he said no offense goes 98 yards on the Rams D last year…………
Pass coverage is garbage period. No one can cover anyone between DB’s n LB’s other than Ramsey.
McVay has a new big time concern on what will prevent him for winning it all and this year and this year it’s more than one player……….
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7717
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Agree. It’s not working with the other CB’s.ocram23 wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 8:49 amanother head scratcher is Morris's scheme to not match Ramsey up with their #1. that worked last year. I thought Ramsey vs Metcalf would have been must see TV and more importantly maybe Ramsey would have limited him to only 1 TD. Yes I know Metcalf did score one on Ramsey. Just don't understand why Morris won't do that. He has Williams trying to guard Metalf which is sillyNorCal RF wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 8:28 am Aikman nailed it last night when he said no offense goes 98 yards on the Rams D last year…………
Pass coverage is garbage period. No one can cover anyone between DB’s n LB’s other than Ramsey.
McVay has a new big time concern on what will prevent him for winning it all and this year and this year it’s more than one player……….
It’s being “advertised” as taking advantage of Ramsey’s skill by moving him around but I’m afraid it’s more Morris not wanting to deal with him being bored. To that I say BS let him be bored while going back to eliminated the other teams best receiver.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RamPower
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: January 18th, 2016, 1:52 pm
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: It’s Raheem
This clearly isn't last year's defense (yet anyway). That said, we've played a few pretty stout offenses. AZ (#1 offense), and Brady…and Wilson (who was having a good year). Still pretty early in the season for true evaluation via sample size, but our schedule does level out a bit toward potentially favoring our defense.
The Geno Smith success was frustrating of course. But this is still the NFL. Teams can score. Were weren't even getting the pressure on Smith we got on Wilson - were SEA players stepping up a notch with Wilson down? Regardless, we've seen this back-up success many times in the NFL = didn't weekly game plan for this guy at all.
But Wilson was having a good year. Our D looked pretty good against him. I mean that game was a divisional war. Pretty much like the playoffs in my estimation. Small sample size yet again, but we looked better overall against Wilson then I thought SF did last week (I recorded the game and watched it all). The Rams are simply better than SEA & SF at this point IMO. SEA defense definitely stepped up for last night's big game (because it usually sucks), but I haven't seen much yet from the whiner defense that should scare our O.
But yeah we have some tough offenses to face overall, and I can't see this defense likely reaching top 10. But it can improve, and sure, even be good. With our offense, we are still legit Super Bowl contenders. We just need to grow and foremost stay healthy.
SEA only scored 17 points last night btw...
The Geno Smith success was frustrating of course. But this is still the NFL. Teams can score. Were weren't even getting the pressure on Smith we got on Wilson - were SEA players stepping up a notch with Wilson down? Regardless, we've seen this back-up success many times in the NFL = didn't weekly game plan for this guy at all.
But Wilson was having a good year. Our D looked pretty good against him. I mean that game was a divisional war. Pretty much like the playoffs in my estimation. Small sample size yet again, but we looked better overall against Wilson then I thought SF did last week (I recorded the game and watched it all). The Rams are simply better than SEA & SF at this point IMO. SEA defense definitely stepped up for last night's big game (because it usually sucks), but I haven't seen much yet from the whiner defense that should scare our O.
But yeah we have some tough offenses to face overall, and I can't see this defense likely reaching top 10. But it can improve, and sure, even be good. With our offense, we are still legit Super Bowl contenders. We just need to grow and foremost stay healthy.
SEA only scored 17 points last night btw...
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- EastBayRamsFan
- VIP Member

- Posts: 524
- Joined: March 2nd, 2016, 7:28 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Are you suggesting that FS Rapp can actually slide over and help on pass coverage?
Rapp always seemed to play in 2 minute prevent mode. I also think this team really misses SS John Johnson.
Rapp always seemed to play in 2 minute prevent mode. I also think this team really misses SS John Johnson.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RamPower
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: January 18th, 2016, 1:52 pm
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Rapp is an in -the-box guy. Had 12 tackles against (led the team) vs. AZ. He just seems slow in coverage (he has also saved some TD's tho). Keep him in the box (TE's) and use him in more specific packages I'd say.EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:23 am Are you suggesting that FS Rapp can actually slide over and help on pass coverage?
Rapp always seemed to play in 2 minute prevent mode. I also think this team really misses SS John Johnson.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: It’s Raheem
On passing downs, Ramsey should be a corner or safety and Rapp should be the guy in the box.RamPower wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:28 amRapp is an in -the-box guy. Had 12 tackles against (led the team) vs. AZ. He just seems slow in coverage (he has also saved some TD's tho). Keep him in the box (TE's) and use him in more specific packages I'd say.EastBayRamsFan wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:23 am Are you suggesting that FS Rapp can actually slide over and help on pass coverage?
Rapp always seemed to play in 2 minute prevent mode. I also think this team really misses SS John Johnson.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RamPower
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: January 18th, 2016, 1:52 pm
- Has thanked: 42 times
- Been thanked: 87 times
Re: It’s Raheem
I don't know what the thinking is on mixing plays, keeping an offense confused and (wrongly guessing) what an offense is going to run on any specific play...but all teams make mistakes on play calls (not to mention purely blown coverages), and yes, I agree about Ramsey staying on Metcalf all night (and certainly not Rapp).
But...17 points
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2805
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: It’s Raheem
The screen out to Collins/Dallas was a 15 yard play whenever they ran it. Morris had no answer. I just don't see his strategy and discipline out there. We stay way too far off the LOS most of the time. If our guys are too slow or lack the agility to play closer, then we need new talent. But I think it just needs proper DC to set it up.
And where is Burgess? I keep saying it. WTF is going on there. Zero snaps?
And where is Burgess? I keep saying it. WTF is going on there. Zero snaps?
"60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: It’s Raheem
End result was good, I just don't like some of the choices Morris makes. Another example is Rochell covering Metcalf, late game, without help.RamPower wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:39 amI don't know what the thinking is on mixing plays, keeping an offense confused and (wrongly guessing) what an offense is going to run on any specific play...but all teams make mistakes on play calls (not to mention purely blown coverages), and yes, I agree about Ramsey staying on Metcalf all night (and certainly not Rapp).
But...17 points
With that said, there is plenty of time to fix the d issues.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11388
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: It’s Raheem
who's running this team??? so we have to make sure JR is playing the defense he wants to play vs doing what's best for the team? Rochelle and Williams aren't getting it done and Williams got hurt last night if I remember correctly. Stafford is going to have to score a lot of pts to win gamesNorCal RF wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:12 amAgree. It’s not working with the other CB’s.ocram23 wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 8:49 am another head scratcher is Morris's scheme to not match Ramsey up with their #1. that worked last year. I thought Ramsey vs Metcalf would have been must see TV and more importantly maybe Ramsey would have limited him to only 1 TD. Yes I know Metcalf did score one on Ramsey. Just don't understand why Morris won't do that. He has Williams trying to guard Metalf which is silly
It’s being “advertised” as taking advantage of Ramsey’s skill by moving him around but I’m afraid it’s more Morris not wanting to deal with him being bored. To that I say BS let him be bored while going back to eliminated the other teams best receiver.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Yeah I am more of a ppg guy myself too. For o and d.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7717
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: It’s Raheem
I think we are actually agreeing……..ocram23 wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 11:00 amwho's running this team??? so we have to make sure JR is playing the defense he wants to play vs doing what's best for the team? Rochelle and Williams aren't getting it done and Williams got hurt last night if I remember correctly. Stafford is going to have to score a lot of pts to win gamesNorCal RF wrote: ↑October 8th, 2021, 9:12 am Agree. It’s not working with the other CB’s.
It’s being “advertised” as taking advantage of Ramsey’s skill by moving him around but I’m afraid it’s more Morris not wanting to deal with him being bored. To that I say BS let him be bored while going back to eliminated the other teams best receiver.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: It’s Raheem
Totally agree. I have said it was the scheme.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 7th, 2021, 8:40 pmYup ... AND
2020 williams > 2021 williams
Maybe it is the scheme ..... too many players doing worse than last year ....has to be the scheme .
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11388
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: It’s Raheem
who said that Morris is moving JR around because he doesn't want him to get bored??? I hope this story is BS
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7717
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Speculation on my part. It has been mentioned in broadcasts as well as on the radio that how he has been used prior to this year had him that. Those who cover the sport have heard this in fact heard it from him.
You have to ask yourself why the change with Morris when him shutting down one side of the field was successful………………..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- haroldjackson
- Special Teams Player

- Posts: 66
- Joined: February 20th, 2016, 1:41 pm
Re: It’s Raheem
I agree losing JJ especially really hurt us. He's the one free agent we should have prioritized. He was the qb of our defense, and we just don't defend the back end like we did last year. I think we may have gotten along w/o Hill, but losing JJ was inexcusable.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 7th, 2021, 8:31 pmYup that was unbelievable . He is trying to be too cute really . Ramsey should cover wr1 ALL GAME . Rapp is a big liability . But Fuller doesn't seem to be much better . I knew losing hill and JJ3 would hurt us but I didn't think it would hurt us THAT much . Combine losing those 2 , with a mediocre DC and there you go . Recipe for disaster . Watching their back up having all day to throw and picking that secondary apart was disgusting .
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5883
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: It’s Raheem
exactly . Love me some Floyd but with the money we gave him we could have re-signed JJ3 AND Hill .haroldjackson wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:49 amI agree losing JJ especially really hurt us. He's the one free agent we should have prioritized. He was the qb of our defense, and we just don't defend the back end like we did last year. I think we may have gotten along w/o Hill, but losing JJ was inexcusable.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 7th, 2021, 8:31 pm Yup that was unbelievable . He is trying to be too cute really . Ramsey should cover wr1 ALL GAME . Rapp is a big liability . But Fuller doesn't seem to be much better . I knew losing hill and JJ3 would hurt us but I didn't think it would hurt us THAT much . Combine losing those 2 , with a mediocre DC and there you go . Recipe for disaster . Watching their back up having all day to throw and picking that secondary apart was disgusting .
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- NorCal RF
- VIP Member

- Posts: 7717
- Joined: October 26th, 2016, 12:11 pm
- Has thanked: 72 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
Re: It’s Raheem
This ^brasilrams wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:51 amexactly . Love me some Floyd but with the money we gave him we could have re-signed JJ3 AND Hill .haroldjackson wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:49 am I agree losing JJ especially really hurt us. He's the one free agent we should have prioritized. He was the qb of our defense, and we just don't defend the back end like we did last year. I think we may have gotten along w/o Hill, but losing JJ was inexcusable.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5883
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Don't agree my man , our secondary is a HUGE mess after JJ3 left , . He was the signal caller , the QB of our defense . Rapp , burgess and Fuller don't even come close to him . We could have kept our secondary the way it was , by signing JJ3 and Hill . We had the number 1 ranked defense against the pass and I think we are something like 25th now .BrooklynRam74 wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:56 amFloyd's better and more important than them. Rams made right choice choosing Floyd over JJ.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:51 am exactly . Love me some Floyd but with the money we gave him we could have re-signed JJ3 AND Hill .
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Rams since '66
- Solid Veteran

- Posts: 206
- Joined: April 27th, 2021, 3:07 pm
Re: It’s Raheem
I am more of a wins & losses guy and not being facetious.
If you are successfully running a ball control offense and time of possession like against Seattle, you hold down the other team's points and yards.
If you are quick strike or three and out, you give the other team more time, hence more opportunity for yards & points.
If you get out to big leads the other team tends to rack up garbage time points and yards.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2805
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: It’s Raheem
Can't keep everyone, and as BrooklynRam said, we would spring a leak somewhere. We also thought we were deep at S/CB. We have Rapp, Burgess, DW, Fuller. And Had Long/Scott on roster too. I still blame the DC. We have talent.
"60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- haroldjackson
- Special Teams Player

- Posts: 66
- Joined: February 20th, 2016, 1:41 pm
Re: It’s Raheem
Floyd's good & it would have been nice to keep J.J., Hill & Brockers. Perhaps we could have saved some money by cutting A'Shawn Robinson, and keeping those three instead. I'm rooting for Robinson to make a big impact, but I haven't seen it thus far. I think we could have gotten another good year out of Brockers, and perhaps that would have made Donald happy, as he liked playing along side Brockers.BrooklynRam74 wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:56 amFloyd's better and more important than them. Rams made right choice choosing Floyd over JJ.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 10:51 am exactly . Love me some Floyd but with the money we gave him we could have re-signed JJ3 AND Hill .
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5883
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 687 times
- Been thanked: 258 times
Re: It’s Raheem
yup ,they ate 47 , that is true . We just gotta hope our team can fix this secondary somehow , this could be a real problem when facing playoff teams .BrooklynRam74 wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 11:41 amI hear ya Brother, but without Floyd we have a bunch of injury-prone pass rushers (Obo, Lewis). I guess either way we go we would spring a leak though. BTW, JJ + Hill and they still gave up 47 last Sunday.brasilrams wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 11:32 am Don't agree my man , our secondary is a HUGE mess after JJ3 left , . He was the signal caller , the QB of our defense . Rapp , burgess and Fuller don't even come close to him . We could have kept our secondary the way it was , by signing JJ3 and Hill . We had the number 1 ranked defense against the pass and I think we are something like 25th now .![]()
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- ocram23
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 11388
- Joined: October 15th, 2019, 6:12 pm
- Has thanked: 163 times
- Been thanked: 372 times
Re: It’s Raheem
he needs to coach and not worry about what JR thinks. do what is best for the team not JRNorCal RF wrote: ↑October 12th, 2021, 9:37 amSpeculation on my part. It has been mentioned in broadcasts as well as on the radio that how he has been used prior to this year had him that. Those who cover the sport have heard this in fact heard it from him.
You have to ask yourself why the change with Morris when him shutting down one side of the field was successful………………..
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- therealheadslap75
- VIP Member

- Posts: 2084
- Joined: February 1st, 2015, 8:35 am
- Has thanked: 58 times
- Been thanked: 96 times
Re: It’s Raheem
I will be happy as can be to sing Raheem's praises if he can slow down Kyler Murray, Lamar Jackson, George Kittle and Aaron Rodgers and we get to the big dance, I just think he needs to prove he can defend an offense with multiple threats
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: It’s Raheem
He did slow down RW and Metcalf. Seattle offense at the time was one of the better offenses in the nfl.therealheadslap75 wrote: ↑October 18th, 2021, 9:58 am I will be happy as can be to sing Raheem's praises if he can slow down Kyler Murray, Lamar Jackson, George Kittle and Aaron Rodgers and we get to the big dance, I just think he needs to prove he can defend an offense with multiple threats
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: DVA_ram33, FelixTheStonerCat, Jacksnow, ocram23, RAMFAN71, SoCalRam78 and 30 guests
