🎧
Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Moderator: GlendoraRam
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Bottom post of the previous page:
My biggest concern is the D-line too . Hopefully long and rochelle can fill in for Hill and we won't miss a step. Also gotta Hope Fuller can be at least ALMOST as good as JJ ( again : big shoes to fill ) I seriously think Whoever lines next to ramsey will elevate their game . Kinda like guys playing next to AD that ends up playing much better .Dick84 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:44 pmWith Hill.. you have the combination of Long and Rochelle replacing him.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:41 pm They addressed , to an extent , yes . I don't like our current safeties replacing JJ . Rapp certainly cannot do it , . Maybe Fuller , we will see . About hill , fox and brockers we are counting on a bunch of 4th , 5th and 7th rounders to replace them . Not gonna be easy , I mean these rookies will have big shoes to fill . I am honestly expecting a decrease in our defensive performance . We can pretty much forget about number 1 , imo . Specially with stailey gone ( damn they should have offered him a HUGE pay increase for him to stay on more year )
Brockers.. you have the combination of Gaines, Robinson and B Brown replacing him.
I think Earnest Brown is a direct replacement for Fox. I don't expect him to produce like Fox as a rookie, of course... I mean roster spot.
My biggest concern for the Rams D is replacing the sacks lost with Fox/Brockers/Ebukam.
And... Staley isn't staying another year for more $$. That's just not happening.
Please Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
yeah , hill was basically a starter . Fox a rotational guy but played tons of snaps too . Changing subjects : I was thinking about the money we gave Floyd .I like him a LOT but Wasn't that a bit too much ? I mean if we let him walk , how many of those guys could we have signed ? Maybe we could have kept Hill and JJ ? JJ and fox ? JJ , hill and fox ? I have no idea but this was something I was thinking about .Dick84 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:46 pm2 "starters" in JJ and Brock.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:43 pm I can speak for me only . I was not very concerned about losing him . But I am concerned about losing 4 starters from our number 1 ranked defense and replacing them with 4th , 5th and 7th round rookies . I know rookies will fill in for vets here and there . But 4 at the same time ? that is basically half the defense right there .
Base Defense.
But.. yeah.. Hill played as many snaps as a starter and Fox played a bunch along with Ebukam.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Agree that the rams coaches are very good at developing talent . Can't argue with that . Let's hope they can turn this rookies into studs too .Cornell29 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:47 pmBrockers will be replaced by A Shawn. We have to see how that plays out. Rams drafted Burgess last year and we have to see how he plays out in the secondary. Maybe Rapp bounces back. Fox was a rotational guy, the rams might already have the next Foxx. They might have drafted the next Fox today.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:43 pm I can speak for me only . I was not very concerned about losing him . But I am concerned about losing 4 starters from our number 1 ranked defense and replacing them with 4th , 5th and 7th round rookies . I know rookies will fill in for vets here and there . But 4 at the same time ? that is basically half the defense right there .
Rams have shown the ability to develop guys and turn them into good players for the rams. Littleton, Hill.and DW to name a few. None were drafted with high picks, the rams grabbed and developed them. JJ was a 3rd rounder and they developed him into a stud. They could do it again this year.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
But if they let him walk and don't spend the money on him , could that money be used to sign like 3 guys , for example : JJ , hill and fox ? If SO...I don't know what I would choose . Having a good edge rusher is important in our division for sure but keeping our secondary intact ( number 1 rated pass defense ) was also extremely important.Dick84 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:53 pmNope.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:52 pm yeah , hill was basically a starter . Fox a rotational guy but played tons of snaps too . Changing subjects : I was thinking about the money we gave Floyd .I like him a LOT but Wasn't that a bit too much ? I mean if we let him walk , how many of those guys could we have signed ? Maybe we could have kept Hill and JJ ? JJ and fox ? JJ , hill and fox ? I have no idea but this was something I was thinking about .
Not with the QBs in the Rams division. They needed at least one plus edge player.
Last edited by brasilrams on May 1st, 2021, 5:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
The way that Floyd contract is structured you could have got JJ and Fox. Even that would have took JJ making his deal into a 2 year deal with some funky structuring. Floyd contract is really just a two year deal. Not sure how many players you hoped the rams could retain with a two year deal. The rams spent more draft revenue on the secondary, also have had a better knack at developing guys in the secondary then they have a OLB.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:57 pmBut if they let him walk and don't spend the money on him , could that money be used to sign like 3 guys , for example : JJ , hill and fox ? If S ...I don't know what I would choose . Having a good edge rusher is important in our division for sure but keeping our secondary intact ( number 1 rated pass defense ) was also extremely important.
So they went with Floyd and trust their ability to develop secondary guys. They did successfully develop, Fuller. JJ, Hill and D Will. I have not seen them have much success developing OLB.
Last edited by Cornell29 on May 1st, 2021, 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
I disagree with the premise of this thread.
Remember all the guys we drafted in the 3-7th rounds the past 3 years that are still on the team? THOSE guys fill the need.
The Rams are a good team and tend to draft well. They draft for upside and quality, not for "need", per se.
Remember all the guys we drafted in the 3-7th rounds the past 3 years that are still on the team? THOSE guys fill the need.
The Rams are a good team and tend to draft well. They draft for upside and quality, not for "need", per se.
The Los Angeles Rams - Making the NFL Great Again. 8-)
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Commish
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2337
- Joined: August 5th, 2016, 12:00 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Perhaps he's Az-zahir Hakeem...idahoramfan wrote: ↑April 30th, 2021, 6:40 pm "By our standards, by some of our measurements, Tutu is one of the fastest, if not the fastest, player in the draft.” - Les Snead"
And? So?
Are you freakin Al Davis?????
ram pathos...
--The Commish
UHURA: "Do you think that's all they ever had?"
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
I know who will replace them it's easy - the WRs we drafted!brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 5:33 amWe have huge needs at defense because we lost 4-5 starters to fa. I don't expect the back ups to fill the role and play as good as our starters were playing. This defense is not gonna be the same by next September. Who is gonna replace brokers, fox, JJ and Troy hill! ??Dick84 wrote: ↑April 30th, 2021, 6:27 pm I'm just going to ask what evidence there is that a team with the number one defense in the NFL has a huge need for a position where they have all their players returning, plus an injured starter returning?
I get that people on here want an ILB... but the Rams showed last year... they know what they want to do on D.
Center? That's something I'm really interested in watching play out, not gonna lie.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Commish
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2337
- Joined: August 5th, 2016, 12:00 pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 153 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Tutu Atwell's 'position' on the Rams' WR depth chart isn't why the McVay/Snead regime drafted him at #57 overall yesterday--rather, it's his ability to supply a lightning-fast deep threat to 'open up' our team's passing attack.
Of course, that's what DeSean Jackson was signed to do as well, however I can understand not counting on Jackson to stay healthy all year, plus he likely won't be around past the 2021 season anyway.
While I wouldn't have drafted Atwell in the second round myself, I do have an understanding of why the Good Guys did so--now it's up to Sean McVay and Matthew Stafford to make that strategy work out...
ram pathos...
--The Commish
UHURA: "Do you think that's all they ever had?"
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
KIRK: "No, but it's all they had left."
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Truth
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2096
- Joined: December 23rd, 2019, 8:55 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
No, the Rams draft poorly. Snead's drafted 3 pro bowlers in 9 years. They have 1 super level Hall of Famer in Aaron Donald that is the sole difference between 6-10 and 10-6 seasons. That one guy, is keeping the ship afloat.
When he retires, the ship is going to sink because Snead has not reinforced the ship. He's in fact loaded the ship with more deadweight.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
I think every Ram hardcore fan knows why they drafted Tutu protection for Jackson and development when he is gone, but still massively bigger needs were there starring us right in the face. We have no ILBs signed next off-season outside of the guy we just drafted. We have Lewis who we can't count on and the OLBs don't seem very promising. No Center Blythe started all last year so who is going to replace him Allen or the kid from the PS who has hardly had one snap at Center. Mind you Blythe was the weakest link on the line and you want to replace him that is weaker ready that sounds like Stafford could get killed.Commish wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 7:03 pmTutu Atwell's 'position' on the Rams' WR depth chart isn't why the McVay/Snead regime drafted him at #57 overall yesterday--rather, it's his ability to supply a lightning-fast deep threat to 'open up' our team's passing attack.
Of course, that's what DeSean Jackson was signed to do as well, however I can understand not counting on Jackson to stay healthy all year, plus he likely won't be around past the 2021 season anyway.
While I wouldn't have drafted Atwell in the second round myself, I do have an understanding of why the Good Guys did so--now it's up to Sean McVay and Matthew Stafford to make that strategy work out...8-) :idea:
ram pathos...
--The Commish
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Last year's wa deeper and we will miss JJ3, possibly Hill, and Brockers just like we did with Saffold when he went to Tennessee. We never replaced him and the OL has never been the same.Dick84 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 7:16 pmNo, they draft well.Truth wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 7:08 pm No, the Rams draft poorly. Snead's drafted 3 pro bowlers in 9 years. They have 1 super level Hall of Famer in Aaron Donald that is the sole difference between 6-10 and 10-6 seasons. That one guy, is keeping the ship afloat.
When he retires, the ship is going to sink because Snead has not reinforced the ship. He's in fact loaded the ship with more deadweight.
On offense last year.. they had only 4 starters that they didn't draft. One of those they got for trading a 5th.. another they got UDFA.
Two FA starters on offense.
On defense they had 4 starters they didn't draft. One of those they traded 2 first for.. another is a UDFA they developed.. another they got back in Marcus Peters trade.. another they got in FA.
The team won 11 games last year and a playoff game on the road.
The only upgrade is Stafford.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- EastBayRamsFan
- VIP Member

- Posts: 524
- Joined: March 2nd, 2016, 7:28 pm
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 64 times
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RadRacerRams
- Special Teams Player

- Posts: 10
- Joined: January 13th, 2015, 6:48 pm
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
hey stop it , your making him look like a Knucklehead with your logic 8-) .......you can't help people who have never stepped foot on a football field.....they don't know how to play , and there not smart enough to realize that Speed kills......especially when it's a deep threat burner who runs a 4.27-40....eas-rams wrote: ↑April 30th, 2021, 6:50 pmidahoramfan wrote: ↑April 30th, 2021, 6:25 pm Just like LAST YEAR:
Need for Center is HUGE
Need for LB is HUGE
....aaaaaaand we take a 150lb WR. What a friggin JOKE!
So when exactly are they going to start paying ?? It’s been 4 years of successful winning seasons and successful draft selections especially in the later rounds.
Go RAMS : Hey does anyone know what Free Agency is
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- RAMFAN71
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2804
- Joined: October 23rd, 2018, 8:14 am
- Has thanked: 69 times
- Been thanked: 134 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
There's no right and wrong. Time will tell. These are all opinions. I like the discussions. Remember every team feels all this. We all want 11 difference makers on both sides of the ball. It's just hard to do because the NFL is actually pretty good at keeping parity with the cap and draft rules.
"60% OF THE TIME........IT WORKS EVERY TIME"
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
True that. Makes sense . Probably easier for the rams to develop safeties than edges . Good edges are not easy to find , so yeah , signing floyd over JJ - when you put it that way - , makes sense , for sure .Cornell29 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 5:02 pmThe way that Floyd contract is structured you could have got JJ and Fox. Even that would have took JJ making his deal into a 2 year deal with some funky structuring. Floyd contract is really just a two year deal. Not sure how many players you hoped the rams could retain with a two year deal. The rams spent more draft revenue on the secondary, also have had a better knack at developing guys in the secondary then they have a OLB.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:57 pm But if they let him walk and don't spend the money on him , could that money be used to sign like 3 guys , for example : JJ , hill and fox ? If S ...I don't know what I would choose . Having a good edge rusher is important in our division for sure but keeping our secondary intact ( number 1 rated pass defense ) was also extremely important.
So they went with Floyd and trust their ability to develop secondary guys. They did successfully develop, Fuller. JJ, Hill and D Will. I have not seen them have much success developing OLB.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- brasilrams
- VIP Member

- Posts: 5881
- Joined: January 6th, 2018, 5:29 pm
- Has thanked: 684 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Totally true about hill . He was inconsistent for years but last year he was amazing . I do think it has something to do with playing next to ramsey , so I think long should be ok . My main concern , really , was not hill , or brockers or fox . My main concern is losing JJ - our secondary - signal caller . Guy was a BEAST and really smart on the field . I don't see Rapp , Fuller or Burgress anywhere NEAR his level . Out of the 3 , I think Fuller has the best chance of TRYING to be as good as JJ . Rapp can't cover and can't stay healthy .Dick84 wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 5:00 pmI think because he's a guy who plays the run and pass so well... Floyd was critical. Remember.. Fox wasn't even guaranteed to be on the roster before last season and David Long will be entering his 3rd. Hill was inconsistent for years and then it clicked. No reason Long can't take a jump this year.brasilrams wrote: ↑May 1st, 2021, 4:57 pm But if they let him walk and don't spend the money on him , could that money be used to sign like 3 guys , for example : JJ , hill and fox ? If S ...I don't know what I would choose . Having a good edge rusher is important in our division for sure but keeping our secondary intact ( number 1 rated pass defense ) was also extremely important.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Skyhook
- Solid Veteran

- Posts: 123
- Joined: February 3rd, 2015, 10:44 pm
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
So you think Stafford retires at 35?....even though he says he want to lead this team for 5, 6, 7 years. Stafford's best years are right in front of him.... plus he's got such a special right arm, he could probably zip darts all over the field until he's 50.
Funny you have such little faith in such a well run organization. You really believe the Rams would ever do this deal knowing it's for only 2 years? Come on man you gotta be more sensible than that....I mean damn dude, you're posting in a public forum that'll be on record forever
And as for Kupp? You are obviously predicting a very short career. Why is that?
Your posts are pure hyperbole with very little substance and lots of attention seeking bullshit.
:R
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Virginia_Rams_Fan
- Promising Rookie

- Posts: 5
- Joined: March 7th, 2018, 5:08 pm
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
I am very concerned about the offensive line. Maybe the Rams front office know something that I don't which I am sure they do...but we did not even go after an OL position. What am I missing?
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Truth
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 2096
- Joined: December 23rd, 2019, 8:55 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
There were lot of fanboys like yourself back in the 2003-2005 that thought were just going to keep rolling even though our drafts were trash and our main superstars were all at the end of their careers. The same thing is happening right now. All you have to do is look at the roster. We had 2 Pro Bowlers on this team last year. 2! That’s it.Skyhook wrote: ↑May 2nd, 2021, 9:23 amSo you think Stafford retires at 35?....even though he says he want to lead this team for 5, 6, 7 years. Stafford's best years are right in front of him.... plus he's got such a special right arm, he could probably zip darts all over the field until he's 50.
Funny you have such little faith in such a well run organization. You really believe the Rams would ever do this deal knowing it's for only 2 years? Come on man you gotta be more sensible than that....I mean damn dude, you're posting in a public forum that'll be on record forever
And as for Kupp? You are obviously predicting a very short career. Why is that?
Your posts are pure hyperbole with very little substance and lots of attention seeking bullshit.
Kupp will be 30 before the 2023 season starts and he’s had a history of injuries. So I’m not expecting more than 2 more productive years from him. Aaron Donald will be 30 before this season starts.
Stafford is at best an average QB today, as a 34 year old. You think he’ll be be better at 35+? His best years aren’t in front of him. He’s been in the league a million years already and never done anything other than out up counting stats on bad teams. He is what he is
This team will be horrible really as soon as 2022 (depending on AD’s drop off) and definitely in 2023.
All you gotta do is look at the roster, look at the age of our main difference makers, look at our recent drafts, look at our upcoming lack of 1st rd draft picks.
It all adds up. “But but but McSneed have winning records every year”. Yeah, so did Martz till he didn’t and anyone with an unbiased brain saw it coming.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
- Cornell29
- Hall of Fame Member

- Posts: 8978
- Joined: September 26th, 2016, 8:56 am
- Has thanked: 97 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
A few things. Martz took over a SB winning team and had 3 winning seasons in 4 years.Truth wrote: ↑May 2nd, 2021, 5:20 pmThere were lot of fanboys like yourself back in the 2003-2005 that thought were just going to keep rolling even though our drafts were trash and our main superstars were all at the end of their careers. The same thing is happening right now. All you have to do is look at the roster. We had 2 Pro Bowlers on this team last year. 2! That’s it.Skyhook wrote: ↑May 2nd, 2021, 9:23 am So you think Stafford retires at 35?....even though he says he want to lead this team for 5, 6, 7 years. Stafford's best years are right in front of him.... plus he's got such a special right arm, he could probably zip darts all over the field until he's 50.
Funny you have such little faith in such a well run organization. You really believe the Rams would ever do this deal knowing it's for only 2 years? Come on man you gotta be more sensible than that....I mean damn dude, you're posting in a public forum that'll be on record forever
And as for Kupp? You are obviously predicting a very short career. Why is that?
Your posts are pure hyperbole with very little substance and lots of attention seeking bullshit.
Kupp will be 30 before the 2023 season starts and he’s had a history of injuries. So I’m not expecting more than 2 more productive years from him. Aaron Donald will be 30 before this season starts.
Stafford is at best an average QB today, as a 34 year old. You think he’ll be be better at 35+? His best years aren’t in front of him. He’s been in the league a million years already and never done anything other than out up counting stats on bad teams. He is what he is
This team will be horrible really as soon as 2022 (depending on AD’s drop off) and definitely in 2023.
All you gotta do is look at the roster, look at the age of our main difference makers, look at our recent drafts, look at our upcoming lack of 1st rd draft picks.
It all adds up. “But but but McSneed have winning records every year”. Yeah, so did Martz till he didn’t and anyone with an unbiased brain saw it coming.
Mcvay took over a team that didn't have a winning season in 13 years or so.
Martz team was loaded with 1st round picks, one year they had 3. Despite all the top picks Martz drafts were so bad that the team couldn't stock players.
As we know it takes around 3 or 4 years to evaluate a draft
The rams 2017 draft was very good especially when they didnt have a 1st round pick. Their first 6 picks are going into year 5 on a nfl team.
Looking back at Martz first draft, which was 2000. Despite having a first rounder, only 2 players played more then 4 years in the nfl. Brian Young, John St Clair and Matt Bowen.
Kupp and Johnson alone is better then anyone Martz drafted in 2000 (was his first draft).
I bring this up to say, McSnead can draft Martz could not.
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Re: Rams going to pay for consistently underdrafting needs
Maybe faith in Rams managementVirginia_Rams_Fan wrote: ↑May 2nd, 2021, 10:05 am I am very concerned about the offensive line. Maybe the Rams front office know something that I don't which I am sure they do...but we did not even go after an OL position. What am I missing?
JB Scott is a HACK!
Please Login or Become a VIP Member to Remove Advertisment
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: LARAMFAN52 and 30 guests
